Indexing metadata

FEATURES OF CORPORATE SECURITY IN POLAND: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, STRATEGIC PRACTICES, AND EMERGING TRENDS


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document FEATURES OF CORPORATE SECURITY IN POLAND: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, STRATEGIC PRACTICES, AND EMERGING TRENDS
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Paulina Kolisnichenko; WSHIU Academy of Applied Sciences; Poland
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) corporate security; Poland; risk management; cybersecurity; compliance; ESG integration; public–private cooperation; strategic governance
 
4. Description Abstract

In the context of increasing global uncertainty, corporate security in Poland has gained growing strategic relevance. Positioned at the intersection of geopolitical pressures, economic transformations, and technological innovation, Poland faces a complex matrix of risks that influence both domestic and international business operations. Corporate security in this environment has evolved from traditional concerns—such as physical asset protection—to a much broader and integrated function encompassing cybersecurity, legal compliance, human capital protection, supply chain integrity, and organizational resilience. To understand its distinctive features, one must consider Poland’s legal framework, institutional maturity, sectoral practices, and emerging security priorities.

This study aims to explore the specific features of corporate security in Poland by analyzing its legislative underpinnings, organizational implementation, strategic integration, and challenges. A particular focus is placed on the link between security management and corporate governance, especially in light of shifting risk environments and European regulatory trends. Methodologically, the study applies qualitative content analysis to legal statutes, national corporate governance codes, and company-level practices. The analysis is guided by a structural systems approach, comparing Poland’s regulatory and operational landscape to wider EU standards, while also incorporating aspects of strategic risk assessment and crisis management theory.

The legal and institutional foundation of corporate security in Poland is built upon a mixture of national legislation and EU directives. The Labour Code sets general standards for workplace safety and internal controls, while the Act on the Protection of Classified Information regulates access and safeguarding of sensitive materials in defense-related industries. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) serves as the core of data security, applying to both private and public sector actors. Financial entities, particularly banks and fintech firms, are also subject to strict obligations under the Act on Counteracting Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing. Furthermore, compliance expectations are rising due to ESG frameworks and the EU’s forthcoming NIS2 Directive on network and information systems security.

Among the defining features of corporate security in Poland is its increasingly multidimensional structure. Enterprises—especially large and publicly listed ones—are now incorporating security as a strategic management function. This entails integrated departments that manage physical protection, cybersecurity, compliance with labor and data protection laws, and oversight of legal and reputational risks. Notably, cybersecurity has become a dominant concern, particularly in light of regional hybrid threats, such as the spillover from the war in Ukraine. As a result, companies are investing in infrastructure upgrades, security awareness training, and internal response protocols.

Corporate security is also becoming embedded in the broader framework of corporate governance. The Code of Best Practice for Warsaw Stock Exchange-listed companies recommends that security issues, particularly those related to information systems and corruption prevention, be reported directly to supervisory boards. This reflects a growing understanding that security is not an operational afterthought but a governance-level responsibility. Moreover, companies in critical sectors—logistics, energy, food supply—are implementing layered systems to secure supply chains, ensure business continuity, and manage operational risks in increasingly digitized environments.

A major strength of the Polish model is its growing emphasis on public–private cooperation. Key national agencies such as the Internal Security Agency (ABW), the Ministry of Digitization, and the National Police maintain partnerships with corporations, particularly in strategic industries. Such collaboration has enhanced Poland’s responsiveness to cross-sectoral risks, particularly in critical infrastructure protection. Concurrently, regulatory oversight by authorities like the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) and the Office for Personal Data Protection (UODO) has pushed companies to internalize risk-based thinking and develop cultures of compliance.

Despite these advances, Poland’s corporate security landscape faces several systemic challenges. Many organizations, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), approach security reactively rather than proactively. This is often due to resource constraints, limited access to qualified personnel—especially in cybersecurity—and lack of internal coordination across departments. Moreover, integration of ESG-related risks remains limited. Companies are only beginning to consider how environmental sabotage, social unrest, or governance failures could manifest as security threats with reputational and operational consequences.

Looking ahead, several emerging trends are shaping the future of corporate security in Poland. Digital transformation continues to accelerate, with companies adopting AI-based threat detection and real-time monitoring systems. At the governance level, there is a growing demand for Chief Security Officers (CSOs) who report directly to the board, a practice increasingly common among larger firms. Meanwhile, ESG-linked audits are gaining traction, partly driven by the EU taxonomy and new sustainable finance obligations. Finally, the rise of hybrid risk scenarios—blending cyber, physical, legal, and reputational dimensions—demands more integrated and scenario-based continuity planning.

In conclusion, corporate security in Poland is undergoing a significant evolution. It is no longer a set of isolated protocols, but a holistic management system aligned with strategy, compliance, and governance. This transformation is supported by a strong legal base and reinforced by public–private cooperation and EU integration. However, to further enhance resilience, Polish companies must bridge the gap between policy and practice by investing in professional capacity, aligning cross-departmental functions, and embedding security into organizational culture. As Poland consolidates its position as a regional economic leader, the strength and adaptability of its corporate security architecture will play a central role in ensuring its long-term competitiveness and stability.

 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2025-05-13
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Paper
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format
 
10. Identifier Universal Resource Indicator https://conf.scnchub.com/index.php/ICCM/ICCM-2025/paper/view/993
 
11. Source Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) International Conference on Corporation Management; International Conference on Corporation Management-2025
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions Authors who submit to this conference agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright over their work, while allowing the conference to place this unpublished work under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely access, use, and share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and its initial presentation at this conference.
b) Authors are able to waive the terms of the CC license and enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution and subsequent publication of this work (e.g., publish a revised version in a journal, post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial presentation at this conference.
c) In addition, authors are encouraged to post and share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before and after the conference.